Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Alternatives to screening for escorts
#25
(06-30-2025, 01:01 PM)okfallsdude Wrote:
(06-30-2025, 08:37 AM)yaletownfuckboi Wrote: When it comes to deposits, remember Katie Angel, who started stealing $100 deposits from clients despite her rate being $700. This illustrates the potential risk of providers going off the rails and doing reckless things like that, even if a $100 deposit doesn't seem like enough incentive for them to do so.

She started to scam people because she got pregnant , but she would also allow bbfs for 300$ soooo could be anybody’s kid 


But this is a prime reason why to never trust an escort, they can go off the rocker and then be spiteful likes it’s all the men they have fucked for money fault. 

A legitimate legal business can ask for deposits , escorts should not.

So far I have not had any issues paying deposits. At first I was apprehensive but prefer it now in comparison to invasive screening 
Deposit or government ID, reference method which could go south for a multitude of reasons?
Easy choice for me 
I am not super wealthy but if I was to lose $50-$100 really not a big deal. Much better than going through with a lackluster session and having buyers remorse
Reply
0



Messages In This Thread
RE: Alternatives to screening for escorts - by lotlizard - 06-30-2025, 09:07 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)