12-22-2024, 10:38 AM
(12-21-2024, 06:46 PM)adastra Wrote: As noted, excellent post Rizzgod.Thanks for sharing your experience and perspective.
Around 2 years ago, I tried some sugar daddy websites. One I tried was SugarDaddyMeet.com. I think I paid $90 US for 3 months, something like that. The site itself is well-designed and secure, with no fakes, etc. However, I found that the userbase was low in my area, and I found most girls on the site to be very subpar and unattractive—about a 5/10 in terms of looks. In the event that I did find a cute girl, she would be nowhere near my area. After 3 months, I didn't renew my membership, and I wouldn't repeat the experience. Also, I'm a bit of a privacy freak, so I'm very uneasy about having my picture online. I did give it a try, but I won't repeat online. In person, I might pitch the idea to a young woman - if under the right circumstances.
In contrast, all the escorts I've seen this year have exceeded my expectations in terms of looks. They are all very beautiful—most have been really hot, sexy, fit, and smart, etc. Check out my reviews; I'm truly amazed by it. I'm intrigued by what motivates these women to enter this business—almost more than the sex itself. Just kidding; I’m definitely there for the sex. However, these women are beautiful and could have rich sugar daddies, yet they choose to escort. Why is that? Is it purely for the money? One escort confessed to me this year that she makes $20,000 per month, which amounts to a quarter of a million per year. How many sugar daddies can match that?
Rizzgod, you said, "Do not make an escort your sugar baby," but you never explained why. Some escorts already do the sugar daddy thing, retire, and then go exclusive with one or two clients. Personally, I try to stay open to all possibilities. A meaningful connection can happen anywhere, and I'm often surprised by how much I misjudge people throughout my life. That said, the problem I see is whether we can really trust an escort? I'd have to say no. I love these ladies—some are so sweet—but I wouldn't trust them in a million years. Or at the very least, it would take a couple of years to build that trust.
OnlyFans seems to me like a gateway to escorting. We already see these girls posting on Leolist. It starts off as "only online," but over time, the lines blur, and before you know it, she's escorting. Just as Altay once said, every woman has a price, and that's simply the truth of it. But men have a price too—aside from monks or ascetics, of course. You said, "Don’t allow women to manipulate you." Haha, ah yes, that's definitely been the age-old goal of all men.
That's interesting. I've never tried SugarDaddyMeet.com, but I've seen ads for it, from my cursory research it seems to have a small user-base compared to the others. I know Seeking is the most popular, and I've heard SecretBenefits is popular too. There's also an app called WhatYourPrice thats apparently popular, but I've only ever used Seeking. The city you're in really matters. Smaller cities don't have as much going on, so many girls from those areas will change their location to bigger cities to try to visit or get flown out, or to travel, I see this a lot with girls from Victoria looking for sugar daddies in Vancouver for example. Seeking seems to be more popular stateside as well, it used to be more popular in Canada but seems to have died down a bit as opposed to pre covid times.I understand what you're saying about privacy. On Seeking, you can have private photos that you only share with the girls you allow. I would usually use two photos: one from the back and one from the front with a hat pulled down so you can mostly just see the bottom of my face. That gives me some plausible deniability, but I would still be hesitant to share them.If you ever think about getting back into it, you should definitely try Seeking. The premium membership is a bit expensive, but I usually pay for it for a month, get a lot of girls' contacts, and meet a bunch, and then take a break for a few months.
Interesting, where do you live? I've definitely been disappointed a lot by escorts in Vancouver. Not hugely, but many do fib about their age and use Photoshop a lot. I've noticed that agency girls seem to have more consistent looks and are less of a surprise compared to independents. Vancouver definitely has very beautiful women overall, and I’m lucky to know and date many attractive civilian women outside of this hobby, as well as some beautiful sugar babies. Because of this, I often compare escorts to them, and they fall short in the looks category for me. That said, it's rare for me to come across an escort I don't want to sleep with, haha.
I think when it comes to who makes more money between sugar babies and escorts, it really varies from person to person. The reasons why women choose to be sugar babies or escorts could be a whole other discussion since there are plenty of pros and cons to each. It also depends on what the woman can command in the market. Personally, if I were a woman, I would find being a sugar baby more appealing than being an escort, even if it meant making less money.
I know a girl from high school who was a model. About four times a year, she would receive $100,000 to spend a few hours with a well-known billionaire. You would never have guessed this about her, as she seemed very innocent and only had sexual relationships with men she was in long-term relationships with, except for this billionaire. I found out through dating her best friend, but it was kept pretty private. It's certainly a rare situation, and she is one of the most beautiful women I've ever seen, but there's stuff like that going on too.
I think the idea of "don't make an escort your sugar baby" is mostly about the different mindsets between escorts and sugar babies. Escorts tend to have a more transactional view, where they get paid by the hour. However, it really depends on the individual, the woman and the type of arrangement. I've had sugar babies where it was mostly sexual, similar to an escort, and others where it felt more like a casual relationship or friends with benefits. Generally, I find that the dynamics with a sugar baby are usually very different from those with an escort.
However, when I book escorts, I usually only book them for about 30 to 90 minutes, and I don't do dinner dates or anything like that, its purely sexual. In contrast, with sugar babies, I might go out for dinner or drinks, or just watch a movie at home along with being intimate, or sometimes its just sex, theres alot more variation but theres never really a time constraint on it unless I want there to be.
Yeah, OnlyFans is definitely a path to escorting. However, I don't think it's very common for girls to do OnlyFans. I believe being a sugar baby is more popular because it's more discreet, and a girl can do it without anyone ever finding out. I also believe that the idea of being a sugar baby is heavily promoted to girls on TikTok, IG, podcasts, and similar platforms as well.