Cameras Located Within Agency and Provider Incall Spaces

[Wario]

Since you can’t post or send pics here, Okfallsdude just texted me the photo. It’s a screenshot of their schedule and it looks like the handler screenshoted their own schedule just as the ring camera notification came on rofl.

Looks like motion sensor activated and took a pic of a neighbour walking by (poor guy).

hahah never underestimate an escorts ability to self sabotage. I guess its the handler or owner but wouldn't surprise me if they are a former escort. 

Bunz has consistently appeared to be one of the less capable agencies, they struggle to create a decent website or share the correct link most of the time, and their scheduling is often inaccurate, constant typos. The owner and handler seem to lack any sort of competence.

[razzar1234]

Since you can’t post or send pics here, Okfallsdude just texted me the photo. It’s a screenshot of their schedule and it looks like the handler screenshoted their own schedule just as the ring camera notification came on rofl.

Looks like motion sensor activated and took a pic of a neighbour walking by (poor guy).

hahah never underestimate an escorts ability to self sabotage. I guess its the handler or owner but wouldn't surprise me if they are a former escort. 

Bunz has consistently appeared to be one of the less capable agencies, they struggle to create a decent website or share the correct link most of the time, and their scheduling is often inaccurate, constant typos. The owner and handler seem to lack any sort of competence.

I heard a lot of the girls there use drugs, sp’s and handlers included. And i mean a lot, even by escort standards.

[Marko]

I found the screenshot I took of the schedule with the door camera at the top of a client

You can’t see him but let me know how to post or share in a private message to prove bunz club has a camera

Indeed this is true. 

What a horrible mistake to make. Wow. Shame on Bunz club.

[Boomba]

Since you can’t post or send pics here, Okfallsdude just texted me the photo. It’s a screenshot of their schedule and it looks like the handler screenshoted their own schedule just as the ring camera notification came on rofl.

Looks like motion sensor activated and took a pic of a neighbour walking by (poor guy).

Can we get the picture with the guy face blurred out?

[okfallsdude]

Since you can’t post or send pics here, Okfallsdude just texted me the photo. It’s a screenshot of their schedule and it looks like the handler screenshoted their own schedule just as the ring camera notification came on rofl.

Looks like motion sensor activated and took a pic of a neighbour walking by (poor guy).

Can we get the picture with the guy face blurred out?

Marko has it , mod can post if they want

[vancouverdude]

hahah never underestimate an escorts ability to self sabotage. I guess its the handler or owner but wouldn't surprise me if they are a former escort. 

Bunz has consistently appeared to be one of the less capable agencies, they struggle to create a decent website or share the correct link most of the time, and their scheduling is often inaccurate, constant typos. The owner and handler seem to lack any sort of competence.

I heard a lot of the girls there use drugs, sp’s and handlers included. And i mean a lot, even by escort standards.

As long as they aren't doing drugs or high during your session, that's their own thing

[razzar1234]

I heard a lot of the girls there use drugs, sp’s and handlers included. And i mean a lot, even by escort standards.

As long as they aren't doing drugs or high during your session, that's their own thing

I didnt say i had an issue with it, as i personally havent visited bunz club. But i personally wouldnt trust a drug addict anywhere near my business.

[Marko]

Can we get the picture with the guy face blurred out?

Marko has it , mod can post if they want

I blurred the photo but you can clearly see the guy when it is not blurred. This must be a peep-hole camera.

Door cameras are ubiquitous in every condo in Vancouver, but really we are concerned about cameras that are inside the apartment.

   

[Plato]

Marko has it , mod can post if they want

I blurred the photo but you can clearly see the guy when it is not blurred. This must be a peep-hole camera.
Door cameras are ubiquitous in every condo in Vancouver, but really we are concerned about cameras that are inside the apartment.

Door cameras are generally not allowed in most condo buildings in Vancouver, I can't even recall the last time I saw one. 
You also need to obtain permission from the building to use them. That’s why these escorts and agencies typically don’t have them.

I agree that the cameras inside the unit pose a much greater concern.
I agree that the cameras inside the unit pose a much greater concern.

[okfallsdude]

Is there a confirmed list or sticky thread ?

So when people read this post they don’t need to scan the entire thing ?

Like could a mod post it somewhere and not allow comments so it’s all in 1 area ?

[Tyrone]

These ladies got issues doing this, man, sheisty and hella creepy. Watch your drinks around these girls, for real.

[Marko]

Is there a confirmed list or sticky thread ?

So when people read this post they don’t need to scan the entire thing ?

Like could a mod post it somewhere and not allow comments so it’s all in 1 area ?

Razzar is keeping a list for us on the first page.

The context is important. This thread displays first hand accounts of users here who have verified they have seen cameras. 

Making a separate list outside of this thread would defeat the purpose of verification.

[LuciferJones]

I blurred the photo but you can clearly see the guy when it is not blurred. This must be a peep-hole camera.
Door cameras are ubiquitous in every condo in Vancouver, but really we are concerned about cameras that are inside the apartment.

Door cameras are generally not allowed in most condo buildings in Vancouver, I can't even recall the last time I saw one. 
You also need to obtain permission from the building to use them. That’s why these escorts and agencies typically don’t have them.

I agree that the cameras inside the unit pose a much greater concern.
I agree that the cameras inside the unit pose a much greater concern.

They're not allowed, but several people are still setting them up, through peephole cameras. They're common, and easy to disguise that even th buildings who have a no door camera policy won't ever know. I personally got cameras on all sides of my townhouse unit, and my strata doesn't know, even though the strata policy is against recording on strata property. They don't have enough policies in place to keep my property safe, and the policies that are there to protect my property are rarely enforced.

[Silverfox]

Anyone else noticed how Ms. Hunter went silent as soon as the laws were posted in this thread?

Kind of pathetic how her "lawyer" got out-lawyered by a bunch of non-lawyers.

[LuciferJones]

Anyone else noticed how Ms. Hunter went silent as soon as the laws were posted in this thread?

Kind of pathetic how her "lawyer" got out-lawyered by a bunch of non-lawyers.

Ms Hunter has had her run ins with this forum from what Ive seen here. I havent seen personally, though I have reason to think shes far more trustworthy than a lot of ladies we have talked about on this forum. I know shes been wronged and victimized as well by perb, albeit she begrudgingly continues her business relations with them due to their more reasonable cost to adverise as well as a large enough following to get advertisers business. She has an attitude problem at times from what ive seen, but shes been around for like twenty years  and i dont see her as someone malicious. Shes the person who Jordan Peterson says is capable of harm, but knows not to use it, where Charlee Beckett is "harmless" until shes given an inch to run a mile. I do remember Ms Hunter reporting issues involving assault and just as well someone going as far as forcing bareback on her. So I can see the need to want a camera to for whoever enters. 

As for her lawyer friend. Lawyers talk out of their asses all the time. They over promise, overcharge, under deliver.... much like the girls who advertise on tryst ?

At least the lawyers went to school and work under a field that has a regulatory body overseeing their practices at their rates.

[okfallsdude]

Anyone else noticed how Ms. Hunter went silent as soon as the laws were posted in this thread?

Kind of pathetic how her "lawyer" got out-lawyered by a bunch of non-lawyers.

Ms Hunter has had her run ins with this forum from what Ive seen here. I havent seen personally, though I have reason to think shes far more trustworthy than a lot of ladies we have talked about on this forum. I know shes been wronged and victimized as well by perb, albeit she begrudgingly continues her business relations with them due to their more reasonable cost to adverise as well as a large enough following to get advertisers business. She has an attitude problem at times from what ive seen, but shes been around for like twenty years  and i dont see her as someone malicious. Shes the person who Jordan Peterson says is capable of harm, but knows not to use it, where Charlee Beckett is "harmless" until shes given an inch to run a mile. I do remember Ms Hunter reporting issues involving assault and just as well someone going as far as forcing bareback on her. So I can see the need to want a camera to for whoever enters. 

As for her lawyer friend. Lawyers talk out of their asses all the time. They over promise, overcharge, under deliver.... much like the girls who advertise on tryst ?

At least the lawyers went to school and work under a field that has a regulatory body overseeing their practices at their rates.

Fair points, but let’s not excuse the fact that Ms. Hunter’s own choices are putting herself in dangerous situations.

If she’s been around for 20 years and still hasn’t figured out how to properly screen clients or protect herself, that’s on her. This isn’t a job where you can afford to be careless,security and vetting are part of the responsibility.

And filming men without their consent? That’s not protecting yourself, it’s crossing a serious line. Privacy is one of the few non-negotiables in this industry. If she can’t uphold that, she has no business complaining when people push back. She can either run things professionally or keep playing the victim, can’t have it both ways.

[LuciferJones]

Ms Hunter has had her run ins with this forum from what Ive seen here. I havent seen personally, though I have reason to think shes far more trustworthy than a lot of ladies we have talked about on this forum. I know shes been wronged and victimized as well by perb, albeit she begrudgingly continues her business relations with them due to their more reasonable cost to adverise as well as a large enough following to get advertisers business. She has an attitude problem at times from what ive seen, but shes been around for like twenty years  and i dont see her as someone malicious. Shes the person who Jordan Peterson says is capable of harm, but knows not to use it, where Charlee Beckett is "harmless" until shes given an inch to run a mile. I do remember Ms Hunter reporting issues involving assault and just as well someone going as far as forcing bareback on her. So I can see the need to want a camera to for whoever enters. 

As for her lawyer friend. Lawyers talk out of their asses all the time. They over promise, overcharge, under deliver.... much like the girls who advertise on tryst ?

At least the lawyers went to school and work under a field that has a regulatory body overseeing their practices at their rates.

Fair points, but let’s not excuse the fact that Ms. Hunter’s own choices are putting herself in dangerous situations.

If she’s been around for 20 years and still hasn’t figured out how to properly screen clients or protect herself, that’s on her. This isn’t a job where you can afford to be careless,security and vetting are part of the responsibility.

And filming men without their consent? That’s not protecting yourself, it’s crossing a serious line. Privacy is one of the few non-negotiables in this industry. If she can’t uphold that, she has no business complaining when people push back. She can either run things professionally or keep playing the victim, can’t have it both ways.

Don't get me wrong. I think there are better ways to screen, it's just that Ms Hunter openly shares that there are cameras inside of the unit (not in the bedroom, from what she claims). I don't like being recorded, but I appreciate that at least she shares that and doesn't throw you off going in, unlike many agencies. This allows me to make an informed decision not to see her, if I don't want to be caught on camera waling into her unit

[MissHunter]

I nuked my posts not because I changed my mind about security cams on private property isn’t illegal
I tried so hard to make it clear that I was just speaking of cams IN GENERAL
Not defending any specific cam or all cams, I don’t know if the entire industry is using them legally or ethically so I don’t want to be part of this argument anymore

Another point. I am not a victim. I choose to be in this industry. I love my job. And I myself know how to screen clients, I rarely have any issues. If I didn’t know how to screen, there’s no way I could be able to Pro-sub for years without major problems

You guys are making so many assumptions

One point I won’t argue is my attitude problem. I certainly can be a mouthy opinionated bitch at times lol

---

Not all places I work out of have cams. And the ones that do you can make a polite request for me to unplug it for your session.

[Silverfox]

Fair points, but let’s not excuse the fact that Ms. Hunter’s own choices are putting herself in dangerous situations.

If she’s been around for 20 years and still hasn’t figured out how to properly screen clients or protect herself, that’s on her. This isn’t a job where you can afford to be careless,security and vetting are part of the responsibility.

And filming men without their consent? That’s not protecting yourself, it’s crossing a serious line. Privacy is one of the few non-negotiables in this industry. If she can’t uphold that, she has no business complaining when people push back. She can either run things professionally or keep playing the victim, can’t have it both ways.

Don't get me wrong. I think there are better ways to screen, it's just that Ms Hunter openly shares that there are cameras inside of the unit (not in the bedroom, from what she claims). I don't like being recorded, but I appreciate that at least she shares that and doesn't throw you off going in, unlike many agencies. This allows me to make an informed decision not to see her, if I don't want to be caught on camera waling into her unit

She works for Skyline, an agency that has cameras in the same room where nudity and sexual activities are happening (small sized studio apartments). Moreover, Skyline does not advertise these cameras in their ads or warn clients beforehand. As a result, Skyline is engaging in illegal activities.

Sure, she will inform clients about their existence here, but the agency she works for does not warn or advertise them. I believe most unsuspecting clients won't come across her posts here before making a booking.

If the cameras were intended for safety, the agency would advertise them and inform clients in advance, as that would serve as a very effective deterrent against problematic clients showing up.