Gabriela Valiente

[MB_]

NOT MY REVIEW:


"I met Gabriella, and I would say she fits somewhat of a sexy nerd fantasy. She’s a bit shy but is good in bed. In terms of her body, she actually has a nice figure; she's slim but has a fairly big butt for her frame. It’s more of a bigger, natural shape rather than a tight gym-built one—still nice, but you should expect some sagging and stretch marks. Face wasnt really my type, made her look much older than her listed age. In terms of personality, I'm not sure she and I really clicked, but your mileage may vary.
It seemed like she might have had a bit of an ego, but maybe it was an off day or I was reading into things too much.

Gabriela's Personality Type: eclectic, has a bit of a "thinks she is hot shit" vibe to her, nerdy.
Facial Rating: 4
Body Rating: 7"


SCREENSHOT OF GABRIELLAS RESPONSE:

   

[adastr@]

Well, I don't see much point in a facial rating if she post her face in her photos, as you can pretty much judge for yourself. But other details would be nice to know. https://tryst.link/escort/gabrielavaliente

[MB_]

Well, I don't see much point in a facial rating if she post her face in her photos, as you can pretty much judge for yourself. But other details would be nice to know. https://tryst.link/escort/gabrielavaliente

True. I haven't seen her as a client, but I've seen her in IRL, and she does appear to look less good facially in real life. It seems her photos are edited to some extent, as the reviewer and other commenters said she looks significantly older in person, and has more blemishes, less symmetry  etc.

So whilst its not as important to rate a face out providers face, there is some utility in doing so if the reasoning is explained

[adastr@]

That makes sense.

[quarterback]

I noticed this review got taken down from perb. what a joke that site is.

This isnt even that bad of a review. I agree she is a 4 facially, if not lower

[adastr@]

Her profile picture on Tryst.

   

[Bobert]

I can see how some would be either way on her face. I think in some photos, she's sexy, but that ass

[DavidWilliams]

Reposting what I wrote in her other thread: It's hard to understand why these hateful comments are tolerated on this platform. I've met her multiple times, she looks exactly like she does in her photos and videos. She's fit, gorgeous, and absolutely flawless!

[adastr@]

Reposting what I wrote in her other thread: It's hard to understand why these hateful comments are tolerated on this platform. I've met her multiple times, she looks exactly like she does in her photos and videos. She's fit, gorgeous, and absolutely flawless!

Where are there hateful comments DavidWilliams? Everybody has different taste. Gabriella looks great to me. There is no sense to argue about her looks when she actually shows us what she looks like, in many different photos and angles too.

[not_a_drugdealer]

regardless on what you think of her looks

does anyone actually believe she is in her 20s?

[Wario]

NOT MY REVIEW:


"I met Gabriella, and I would say she fits somewhat of a sexy nerd fantasy. She’s a bit shy but is good in bed. In terms of her body, she actually has a nice figure; she's slim but has a fairly big butt for her frame. It’s more of a bigger, natural shape rather than a tight gym-built one—still nice, but you should expect some sagging and stretch marks. Face wasnt really my type, made her look much older than her listed age. In terms of personality, I'm not sure she and I really clicked, but your mileage may vary.
It seemed like she might have had a bit of an ego, but maybe it was an off day or I was reading into things too much.

Gabriela's Personality Type: eclectic, has a bit of a "thinks she is hot shit" vibe to her, nerdy.
Facial Rating: 4
Body Rating: 7"


SCREENSHOT OF GABRIELLAS RESPONSE:

I didn't even see her response when I first saw this review.
Thats messed up.

Why is it that whenever an escort receives a negative review, their typical response is to claim that the review is fake?
Her reasoning doesn't even make any sense. It says a lot about her character, definitely a red flag.

[adastr@]

I didn't even see her response when I first saw this review.
Thats messed up.

Why is it that whenever an escort receives a negative review, their typical response is to claim that the review is fake?
Her reasoning doesn't even make any sense. It says a lot about her character, definitely a red flag.

Well Wario, we must keep in mind that certain SPs attract weirdos and haters, Gabriella is among those that do. I can verify this. 

So if this user just signed up, then she has a legit criticism. She shows her face for crying out loud, how much more do you guys need? This is the weirdest review I've seen where you judge her face when she actually shows it in many different photos. You are probably gay or trans if you rate her face a 4 out of 10.

[yaletownfuckboi]

I didn't even see her response when I first saw this review.
Thats messed up.

Why is it that whenever an escort receives a negative review, their typical response is to claim that the review is fake?
Her reasoning doesn't even make any sense. It says a lot about her character, definitely a red flag.

Well Wario, we must keep in mind that certain SPs attract weirdos and haters, Gabriella is among those that do. I can verify this. 

So if this user just signed up, then she has a legit criticism. She shows her face for crying out loud, how much more do you guys need? This is the weirdest review I've seen where you judge her face when she actually shows it in many different photos. You are probably gay or trans if you rate her face a 4 out of 10.

Acting like Facetune and Photoshop dont exist.
When like 80-90% of civilian women are using Facetune and Photoshop, do you genuinely believe that escorts aren't doing the same? Especially given how advantageous it is for them to use it.

I guess i'm gay or trans cause id probably rate her face around a 4 out of 10 as well.

[MB_]

I didn't even see her response when I first saw this review.
Thats messed up.

Why is it that whenever an escort receives a negative review, their typical response is to claim that the review is fake?
Her reasoning doesn't even make any sense. It says a lot about her character, definitely a red flag.

Well Wario, we must keep in mind that certain SPs attract weirdos and haters, Gabriella is among those that do. I can verify this. 

So if this user just signed up, then she has a legit criticism. She shows her face for crying out loud, how much more do you guys need? This is the weirdest review I've seen where you judge her face when she actually shows it in many different photos. You are probably gay or trans if you rate her face a 4 out of 10.

The person who sent me this review on Perb has written around 15 highly detailed reviews and has been a member there for quite some time. Would you like to explain why you think he's a weirdo?

I'm fairly certain she's just a provider who receives protection from Perb because she pays for advertising there, which is why all her negative reviews are removed.

I mean, she seems to be associated/friends with some of the more misandrist providers, as well as others who have doxxed clients in the past. So, questioning her credibility and character is understandable.

[adastr@]

Acting like Facetune and Photoshop dont exist.
When like 80-90% of civilian women are using Facetune and Photoshop, do you genuinely believe that escorts aren't doing the same? Especially given how advantageous it is for them to use it.

I guess i'm gay or trans cause id probably rate her face around a 4 out of 10 as well.

Maybe she does, but it can't be that drastic. Curious then, how do you rate her Facetuned face?

The person who sent me this review on Perb has written around 15 highly detailed reviews and has been a member there for quite some time. Would you like to explain why you think he's a weirdo?

I'm fairly certain she's just a provider who receives protection from Perb because she pays for advertising there, which is why all her negative reviews are removed.

I mean, she seems to be associated/friends with some of the more misandrist providers, as well as others who have doxxed clients in the past. So, questioning her credibility and character is understandable.

I never said this reviewer was a weirdo, I only quested if it was his first post. I think the weirdo was 8Jajhon I banned for posting crap about her, can't remember now. But you are correct that, who she associates with is a legit criticism. And of course every paid provider gets protection on Perb from negative reviews.

[razzar1234]

Maybe she does, but it can't be that drastic. Curious then, how do you rate her Facetuned face?

yeah, that's what confused me about this initially. her face in the photos is above average, but i guess they don't match how she looks like in real life? 

and from my experience, girls can facetune the fuck outta their pics. I rarely use tinder nowadays but just a few dates taught me how extreme it can get. combine that with the obvious boost provided by makeup and good lighting, and you can legit turn a 5 into a 9. shits fucked.

[quarterback]

I actually saw her
Back when she wasn't face out when she was working at WCA I think? It was a while ago.
Her face is edited, in real life, her eyes are smaller, her skin is less smooth and tight, and her face is rounder and less defined. Overall, she looks less attractive in person compared to the photos.
Physically, she's not too different, but is less toned. When I saw her, she didn't have visible tone lines on the sides of her stomach, just an average girl’s body with a bigger butt (her butts nice).

Regarding her service and attitude, I had no complaints, she was just average, perhaps a little on the shy side.

I gotta agree, I really wouldn't rate her face above a 4, I was immediately disappointed when I saw it.

[DavidWilliams]

Reposting what I wrote in her other thread: It's hard to understand why these hateful comments are tolerated on this platform. I've met her multiple times, she looks exactly like she does in her photos and videos. She's fit, gorgeous, and absolutely flawless!

Where are there hateful comments DavidWilliams? Everybody has different taste. Gabriella looks great to me. There is no sense to argue about her looks when she actually shows us what she looks like, in many different photos and angles too.

I understand that everyone has different tastes, and I fully respect that. However, the issue here isn't about personal preference, it's about the spread of false information. Also, if someone isn’t fond of how a person looks, there are ways to express an opinion while still being respectful. Sadly, that courtesy seems to be missing here. And really, what’s the point of repeating the same negative remarks over and over? It’s exhausting to read so much negativity.

What I find truly harmful is when members post untrue claims about her. I've noticed this happens with other women on this forum as well, being unfairly criticized with falsehoods about their looks, personalities, or services. I don’t know the motivation behind it, but it’s deeply disappointing and unfairly damages the reputations of these ladies. False comments like:

- “You should expect some sagging and stretch marks”
- “She looks significantly older in person, and has more blemishes, less symmetry  etc.”
- “She is a 4 facially, if not lower”

The other thread about Gabriella is worse (https://www.menz.life/forum/showthread.php?tid=116), there are even more disturbing remarks. These don’t sound like fair assessments, they sound like attempts to demean. It makes me wonder whether some posters have even met her. The comments are exaggerated, and frankly, don’t make sense.

Yes, everyone has different tastes but there’s also such a thing as common sense and basic judgment. Calling her a '4 facially, if not lower' is just absurd. If that were true, it would imply that 90% of people fall below that. Come on! Among the women I've met in person, and seen unfairly targeted with false information about their appearance, service, and/or personality, are Mia Kane, Elise Vissant, Cassia Green, Skyler Mack, Rose Paradis, Amelia Omar, and Camille Clarke.

I really hope this forum can become a space that encourages more kindness, accuracy, and ethics.

[yaletownfuckboi]

Where are there hateful comments DavidWilliams? Everybody has different taste. Gabriella looks great to me. There is no sense to argue about her looks when she actually shows us what she looks like, in many different photos and angles too.

I understand that everyone has different tastes, and I fully respect that. However, the issue here isn't about personal preference, it's about the spread of false information. Also, if someone isn’t fond of how a person looks, there are ways to express an opinion while still being respectful. Sadly, that courtesy seems to be missing here. And really, what’s the point of repeating the same negative remarks over and over? It’s exhausting to read so much negativity.

What I find truly harmful is when members post untrue claims about her. I've noticed this happens with other women on this forum as well, being unfairly criticized with falsehoods about their looks, personalities, or services. I don’t know the motivation behind it, but it’s deeply disappointing and unfairly damages the reputations of these ladies. False comments like:

- “You should expect some sagging and stretch marks”
- “She looks significantly older in person, and has more blemishes, less symmetry  etc.”
- “She is a 4 facially, if not lower”

The other thread about Gabriella is worse (https://www.menz.life/forum/showthread.php?tid=116), there are even more disturbing remarks. These don’t sound like fair assessments, they sound like attempts to demean. It makes me wonder whether some posters have even met her. The comments are exaggerated, and frankly, don’t make sense.

Yes, everyone has different tastes but there’s also such a thing as common sense and basic judgment. Calling her a '4 facially, if not lower' is just absurd. If that were true, it would imply that 90% of people fall below that. Come on! Among the women I've met in person, and seen unfairly targeted with false information about their appearance, service, and/or personality, are Mia Kane, Elise Vissant, Cassia Green, Skyler Mack, Rose Paradis, Amelia Omar, and Camille Clarke.

I really hope this forum can become a space that encourages more kindness, accuracy, and ethics.

I think you might want to learn the distinction between objective and subjective. It's quite simple.

Sure, there’s a fine line where negative reviews might seem rude, but there's also a difference between honesty and rudeness. This is something these providers signed up for, given that they’re offering a paid service, especially considering that for most of these ladies they’re using non-representative photos, which is an objective issue. Photo editing, flattering lighting/angles, outdated photos, exists and is rampant, care to debunk that?

For example, you stated here, "Calling her a '4 facially, if not lower' is just absurd. If that were true, it would imply that 90% of people fall below that." This doesn't even make logical sense, wouldn't it just mean 60% then? And that's assuming we're grading on a perfectly evenly distributed 1-10 scale, which most people using the scale aren't.  

It's entirely reasonable for users to think she is less attractive facially than 60% of women in Vancouver who are 27 years old, especially if we're assuming a perfectly even distribution on a 1-10 scale, as you suggested. Personally, I’m in my late 20s, and most of the women I know in my personal life are around Gabrielle’s listed age. I believe this is a fair and valid assessment.

Wouldn't the most ethical and honest approach for users on this forum be to provide genuine, honest and objective reviews? To be honest, your reviews don’t seem very authentic, and I’ve noticed you tend to cherry-pick and only respond to certain observations and comments. Additionally, your "reviews" are quite vague, giving the impression that you haven't actually seen any of these women, and it’s possible you’re not even a man but a provider pretending to be one.

Regardless of your identity, you certainly don’t come across as very logical or capable of presenting a coherent argument or constructive criticism.